Data Reinforces ‘Don’t Ask for Feedback You Are Not Prepared to Act On’

Quantum Workplace Survey Also Shows Cadence Is an Important Factor

In the experience world, both for customer and employee, there is real risk in not responding to feedback. Both groups must feel like their voices are heard and that concerns will be addressed. If repeatedly asked for feedback without any follow-up, feedback participants will grow weary of the “ask” and ignore it moving forward. They will lose trust in the idea that their voices matter and become frustrated with the relationship.

For employees in this challenging and turbulent economy, it is more important than ever that companies are checking in with their staff members. Companies must continuously gauge employee sentiment, concerns, questions, and friction areas so that action can be taken to support staff. Monitoring for burnout will be an important task as companies seek to retain the employees they have.

However, collecting feedback, in whatever format or channel a company chooses, must be done thoughtfully and with an eye towards what action can be taken.

Recent data from Quantum Workplace showed that only 48% of employees say significant changes are made at their organizations as a result of employee feedback. For those employees working with leaders and managers who are exceptional at communicating and taking action on survey results, 95% are highly engaged. This is demonstrably bigger than the 34% high engagement reported by employees who say that kind of communication and action is nonexistent.

How does this disconnect happen? Potentially, a company has asked about too many initiatives that they cannot possibly take action on. Perhaps they are implementing changes, but they have done a poor job of communicating it back to employees and closing the loop. Or worse yet, there was silence on the feedback. Employees want transparency and if there are initiatives that simply will not be able to launch, even if they are of high importance to their employees, this communication must be made. Employers must work to provide a steady flow of accurate, timely, and empathic communications with their employees regarding any feedback or voice of the employee program.

On the positive side, the Quantum Workplace data did report actions being taken on a number of issues. Top actions taken after employee feedback was received via surveys include changes related to compensation and benefits, policy, and procedure changes, return to work or remote work, and communication. 

Cadence is another issue related to employee engagement. In the data, monthly surveying was associated with the highest level of engagement. However, it is often a hard balance, as those surveyed on a monthly basis also were more likely to say they were being over surveyed.

Source: Quantum Workplace

Quantum Workplace Lead Researcher Shane McFeely says, “Asking for employee feedback doesn’t increase engagement. Organizations need to find meaning in their survey data and make changes to improve the employee experience. Employees are more engaged when they see their employer actively trying to make work better every day and feel valued for providing feedback that improved their experience.” 

Author Information

As a detail-oriented researcher, Sherril is expert at discovering, gathering and compiling industry and market data to create clear, actionable market and competitive intelligence. With deep experience in market analysis and segmentation she is a consummate collaborator with strong communication skills adept at supporting and forming relationships with cross-functional teams in all levels of organizations.

She brings more than 20 years of experience in technology research and marketing; prior to her current role, she was a Research Analyst at Omdia, authoring market and ecosystem reports on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and User Interface technologies. Sherril was previously Manager of Market Research at Intrado Life and Safety, providing competitive analysis and intelligence, business development support, and analyst relations.

Sherril holds a Master of Business Administration in Marketing from University of Colorado, Boulder and a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology from Rutgers University.

SHARE:

Latest Insights:

Stefano Pallard, Head of Fan Development at Ferrari, and Daniel Newman explore how AI and data are redefining fan engagement in Formula 1, showcasing Ferrari's collaboration with IBM.
Juniper Networks Showed AI Network Design, Implementation, and Operation at AI Infrastructure Field Day
Alastair Cooke, Tech Field Day Event Lead at Futurum, shares his insights on the Juniper Networks presentation at AI Infrastructure Field Day. Intent-based design and deployment using Apstra delivers 800 GB Ethernet for GPUs, storage, and front-end access, making an AI-ready Data Center.

Latest Research:

In our latest Market Brief, Building Optimal Cyber Resilience with All-Flash Protection Infrastructure, developed in partnership with Dell Technologies, The Futurum Group explores how next-gen data protection infrastructure can safeguard critical workloads and support rapid recovery, with a focus on Dell’s PowerProtect Data Domain All-Flash appliance.
In our latest Research Brief, Oracle Database@Azure: The Genesis of Oracle’s Multi-Cloud Leadership, completed in partnership with Oracle, The Futurum Group explores how enterprises can simplify migration, reduce costs, and modernize operations while gaining a competitive edge in AI-driven application development.
In our latest Research Brief, Hammerspace Tier 0: Unlocking Greater Efficiency in GPU-Driven Computing, The Futurum Group explores how organizations can overcome latency and storage inefficiencies by unlocking stranded NVMe capacity within GPU servers.

Book a Demo

Thank you, we received your request, a member of our team will be in contact with you.