With Gelsinger as New CEO, Intel Gets an Engineer Who Can Bring Back Innovation

With Gelsinger as New CEO, Intel Gets an Engineer Who Can Bring Back Innovation

Pat Gelsinger, with Eight Patents to his Name, will aim to Narrow the gap to Competitors AMD and NVIDIA

It wasn’t hard to sense that change was on the horizon for Intel.

After a tumultuous few weeks for the company, including the well-documented memo from activist investor Dan Loeb, it would be difficult not to expect Intel’s board to react with a bold move.

So the legendary Santa Clara, Calif.-based chip maker lured VMware VMW, +3.39% Chief Executive Officer Pat Gelsinger. Let’s not overstate Loeb’s role in this. Rumors of Intel’s INTC, -3.31% search for a new CEO had been pervasive for five months as investors lost patience.

Intel’s challenges are well-understood, and many of them preceded Bob Swan’s appointment as CEO in January 2019. This has been a big reason that the company’s stock price has been repressed, despite tremendous growth for its biggest competitors, namely AMD AMD, -6.82% and NVIDIA NVDA, -4.66%. Even Qualcomm QCOM, -5.91% has enjoyed a surge as regulatory battles subsided and 5G demand surged.

In short, Intel has struggled to get out of its own way. The company’s executives have said the right things, but when timelines for new chips were coming due, the company was forced to delay. This was especially prevalent for the company’s 7- and 10-nm launch, which saw many delays costing the company big in retooling their fabrication plants.

AMD Applies Pressure

Perhaps more costly than production delays was strong competition from AMD. CEO Lisa Su’s bold moves were bearing fruit as the company’s Ryzen CPUs took notebook market share from Intel, which was clearly vulnerable. Couple this with Intel being notably slow in defining its positioning in the artificial intelligence space, seeing Nvidia strengthen its position, while Intel’s first big acquisition, Nervana, stall out only to be shelved as it opted to acquire a more robust solution in Habana. However, this delay to market once again set back the company in a key market, which investors couldn’t turn a blind eye to.

Big Customers Lose Faith

Apple’s AAPL, -1.69% entry into the fray as a chipmaker was a pivotal moment that likely accelerated the course to appoint Gelsinger. While the market share for Mac (about 8%) and its impact on Intel’s revenue (2%-3%) wasn’t as large as some may think, the perception that Apple building its own chip rather than partnering with Intel was difficult for many investors to accept. This lengthy partnership’s erosion from working together to build modems for their next-generation iPhones to outfitting their Macs is all but over.

Amazon’s AMZN, -3.36% AWS also deepened its chip offerings and Microsoft’s MSFT, -0.61% plan to follow suit only added pressure on Intel. The optics here are bad, and the Street made that clear with its bearish valuation of the company.

Engineer vs Businessman

Gelsinger’s profile comes as a stark contrast to Swan’s. Gelsinger is renowned for his engineering, and he is deeply respected within Intel’s walls, having spent 30 years at the company, including serving as its first-ever chief technology officer from 2000-2005. Gelsinger has a graduate degree in electrical engineering from Stanford and eight patents in areas including computer architecture. In contrast, Swan has an MBA from Binghamton.

Based on several factors, Gelsinger is an excellent decision for Intel, and the timing of his appointment is important. While the noted challenges that Intel has faced over the past several years have certainly impacted investor sentiment and the stock price, the company has overall sustained strong market share in key areas, including its data center CPUs, which still sits at over 90% of the market.

That business is highly profitable, which has over the past several quarters helped to prop up Intel’s earnings when CPU shortages and delays slowed results on the client computing side of the business.

The company has also maintained deeply seated partnerships with its original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and original design manufacturer (ODM) partners, and continues to benefit from its ecosystem’s strength.

Righting the Ship

With PC demand and cloud computing growing, one of the most complete portfolios of chips to enable partners, the situation that Gelsinger is inheriting isn’t as dark as some may insinuate. In fact, I think a few short-term wins, especially with its new XPU strategy and a bold showing of operational excellence with its new chip designs, could right the ship quickly for Intel, returning investor confidence and a jolt to the stock price.

In terms of Gelsinger’s early days and areas of focus, I think he will be pivotal in returning the company to its technology leadership roots. This is in his DNA, and it has served him well in leading VMware to consistent double-digit revenue growth in an increasingly crowded market.

Company Culture

Gelsinger’s impact on the culture will help speed innovation, attract top engineering talent and help Intel push the envelope in its efforts to outpace the competition. As a result, it will regain some market share it has lost while building a broad portfolio of data-centric solutions that have driven Intel’s total addressable market (TAM) north of $300 billion.

Lastly, I do see Gelsinger turning the screws on operational excellence. This will mean a bold push to meeting the timelines that have been alluded to in recent years for the company’s next-generation process nodes. This could include a level of de-risking that could see Intel having its chips not only made in its own fabrication plants but using outsourced manufacturing to assure volume and yield that can meet market demand.

It’s a tough slate for the soon-to-be Intel CEO, but there are many reasons to believe Gelsinger is a promising appointment to accelerate Intel’s innovation and improve returns for investors who have stuck by the chip giant.

Futurum Research provides industry research and analysis. These columns are for educational purposes only and should not be considered in any way investment advice.

The original version of this article was first published on MarketWatch.

Author Information

Daniel is the CEO of The Futurum Group. Living his life at the intersection of people and technology, Daniel works with the world’s largest technology brands exploring Digital Transformation and how it is influencing the enterprise.

From the leading edge of AI to global technology policy, Daniel makes the connections between business, people and tech that are required for companies to benefit most from their technology investments. Daniel is a top 5 globally ranked industry analyst and his ideas are regularly cited or shared in television appearances by CNBC, Bloomberg, Wall Street Journal and hundreds of other sites around the world.

A 7x Best-Selling Author including his most recent book “Human/Machine.” Daniel is also a Forbes and MarketWatch (Dow Jones) contributor.

An MBA and Former Graduate Adjunct Faculty, Daniel is an Austin Texas transplant after 40 years in Chicago. His speaking takes him around the world each year as he shares his vision of the role technology will play in our future.

Related Insights
Will Glean's NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra Integration Shift the Enterprise AI Stack?
June 6, 2026

Will Glean’s NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra Integration Shift the Enterprise AI Stack?

Glean's integration of NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra marks a pivotal moment in enterprise AI, where model flexibility and infrastructure alignment become strategic competitive advantages for buyers seeking cost-effective, high-context solutions....
Marvell’s Teralynx T100 Puts Power Efficiency at the Center of AI Networking
June 5, 2026

Marvell’s Teralynx T100 Puts Power Efficiency at the Center of AI Networking

Tom Hollingsworth, Networking Technology Advisor and Event Lead at Futurum, examines how the Marvell Teralynx T100 addresses AI networking power and latency constraints as hyperscalers build larger AI clusters....
Can NVIDIA Cosmos 3 Make Open Physical AI a Reality, Or Will Fragmentation Stall Progress?
June 5, 2026

Can NVIDIA Cosmos 3 Make Open Physical AI a Reality, Or Will Fragmentation Stall Progress?

NVIDIA Cosmos 3 launches as the first open omni-model for physical AI, targeting robotics and embodied AI with an open-source approach that challenges proprietary models from OpenAI, Google, and Amazon,...
HPE Q2 FY 2026: AI Orders Remain Strong as Supply Constraints Persist
June 4, 2026

HPE Q2 FY 2026: AI Orders Remain Strong as Supply Constraints Persist

Futurum Research analyzes HPE Q2 FY 2026 earnings, focusing on AI-driven demand across servers and networking, supply constraints affecting conversion, and what updated FY 2026 and FY 2027 guidance implies...
Intel’s COMPUTEX Keynote Reframes an Iconic Company as a Silicon-to-Systems AI Lab
June 4, 2026

Intel’s COMPUTEX Keynote Reframes an Iconic Company as a Silicon-to-Systems AI Lab

Brendan Burke, Research Director at Futurum, examines the Intel agentic AI pivot at COMPUTEX 2026, where Xeon 6+ on 18A, Rackscale Blueprints, and a Perplexity hybrid demo reframe the CPU...
Agentic AI
June 3, 2026

Salesforce Bets on Agentic Marketing: Will Unified AI Agents Redefine Martech ROI?

Keith Kirkpatrick, Vice President & Research Director, Enterprise Software & Di at Futurum, analyzes how Salesforce's agentic AI marketing platform leverages collaborative agents for campaign creation, lead qualification, and customer...

Book a Demo

Newsletter Sign-up Form

Get important insights straight to your inbox, receive first looks at eBooks, exclusive event invitations, custom content, and more. We promise not to spam you or sell your name to anyone. You can always unsubscribe at any time.

All fields are required






Thank you, we received your request, a member of our team will be in contact with you.