Search

Poly Rebrand — Poly Folly. Why the Rebrand Might Not Make Sense

poly rebrand

Poly Rebrand — Stumbling Ahead

March of 2018 gave us the significant acquisition of Polycom by Plantronics for $2 billion USD. The purchase puts Plantronics squarely in the middle of the Unified Communications (UC) space. The peripheral manufacturer had lived on, well, the peripheral of the UC space for years making headsets for communications. One year post acquisition, the company has taken both names and combined them into a new brand identity: Poly. The announcement of the Poly rebrand was made at the beginning of  Enterprise Connect 2019. Here’s why that Poly rebrand may not be such a great idea.

Branding Poly — How’d We Get There?

What is Poly, anyway? The company would have you know that the word “poly” means “many.”  That’s great. What does that mean? Plantronics and Polycom separately have almost 100 years combined of brand recognition. Plantronics has been around since the 1960s, Polycom has created UC products since 1990.

By combining the two together under the Poly rebrand, it does two things. First, the company is disposing of a brand identity that both the UC industry as a whole and consumers identify with. The second part is more troubling, and that’s that the new brand seems to lean on the newer, and some could argue less well-known brand identity, Polycomm. Poly is incredibly close to Polycom. In fact, their new website is Poly.com. Polycom. So, the inevitable question: Did Plantronics buy Polycom or the other way around?

Legal Challenges of the Poly Rebrand

If you have any questions about the wisdom of the Poly rebrand, go ahead and Google the new company. It doesn’t come up on the first page. Second-page results only serve up the Poly YouTube channel. Google has a Poly site, a site dedicated to 3D graphics and design objects. One would think that SEO would play a role in a rebrand effort, and clearly, someone wasn’t thinking on that front.

Poly and PDP logo
PDP LLC filed a complaint against Poly for trademark infringement. (Contributed: PDP Gaming)

Then you have the Poly logo. A day after the Poly rebrand and logo art were introduced, the UC company was hit with a lawsuit from PDP Gaming. It seems as though Poly’s new logo is a carbon copy of a logo PDP Gaming has been using since late in 2018. In response, Poly said they developed their logo independently.  While that’s great, it seems clear that someone didn’t do their homework here. In fact, there’s a feature on Google that allows you to reverse-search an image. A good practice for anyone creating new graphics and art is to start there. A good practice for an in-house marketing team would be to do the same before approving logo artwork.

From a corporate culture standpoint, there may have been incredibly good reasons for the Poly rebrand — combining the two companies under a single name. Two large organizations coming together under a single banner can provide unity and a sense of camaraderie. But it can also create confusion if the deployment is not thoroughly thought out. Discarding decades of brand loyalty, as well as failing to fully vet the new name and logo as part of the Poly rebrand are serious missteps. Hopefully Poly can come out of this a bit wiser for future moves.

Futurum Research provides industry research and analysis. These columns are for educational purposes only and should not be considered in any way investment advice. 

Author Information

Timothy Albright is Analyst in Residence at Futurum Research where he covers the Collaboration, Unified Communication and ProAV space. Tim is also the founder of AVNation, an audiovisual industry B2B media firm. Taking the data, ideas, and objectives of clients and industry leaders and turning them into easily digestible content is where Timothy has lived and worked for the last twenty years. His career has lead him into broadcast television and radio, education, programming, digital media production, and has been teaching and producing podcasts since 2006. Over the last ten years, Timothy has been focused on researching where business communication is and where it is going. This includes working with education, healthcare, and Fortune 1000 companies leverage their existing infrastructure to help their employees and customers communicate more effectively and efficiently. In addition to hosting and producing a weekly AV and UC news program, he has contributed to several industry-leading publications. Timothy has lead industry discussions around the globe and is a highly sought-after moderator for his ability to bring the real-world uses into conversations and panel discussions.

SHARE:

Latest Insights:

Cisco and Intel Bolster Their Ability to Accelerate Private 5G Worldwide by Giving Partners and Customers Access to Three New Innovation Centers
The Futurum Group’s Ron Westfall examines why the expansion of Cisco’s collaboration with Intel can accelerate global private 5G implementations as partners and customers can access three new innovation centers.
Rami Rahim, CEO at Juniper Networks, joins Daniel Newman to share his insights on AI-native networking and its significant impact on the industry, offering a glimpse into Juniper’s innovative approach and future prospects.
A Comprehensive List of Qualcomm’s Most Relevant Generative AI Announcements at Mobile World Congress Barcelona 2024
Olivier Blanchard, Research Director at The Futurum Group, discusses Qualcomm’s latest on-device generative AI announcements at MWC 2024, hinting at the massive market opportunity for OEMs and ISPs.
Qualcomm’s New AI Hub Solves Two Key Challenges for On-Device AI’s Market Opportunity: Velocity and Scale
Olivier Blanchard, Research Director at The Futurum Group, discusses why the Qualcomm AI Hub is exactly what the company and its OEM partners needed to accelerate the on-device AI app ecosystem to boost market adoption of AI-capable devices.