Zendesk Announces Outcome-based Pricing Model for AI Agents

Zendesk Announces Outcome-based Pricing Model for AI Agents

Analyst(s): Keith Kirkpatrick
Publication Date: August 30, 2024

The News: Zendesk announced it is implementing an outcome-based pricing model for its AI agents. This model is designed to reflect the advanced capabilities of an automated solution that can deliver real value to customers. It focuses on results rather than seat licenses or consumption-based models, which are often better applied to human or human-adjacent functions.

Zendesk Announces Outcome-based Pricing Model for AI Agents

Analyst Take: Zendesk has been evaluating ways to link its services to value more effectively, particularly concerning delivering generative AI capabilities. The company has acknowledged that the traditional, human-centric pricing models are no longer relevant to mostly or entirely autonomous agents. As such, Zendesk has announced a significant shift in its pricing model that is focused on outcomes rather than on token-based consumption or via a seat-license model, which has little relevance to the actual economics of AI-powered agents.

AI Agents Represent a Paradigm Shift for CX

Zendesk AI agents are designed to resolve complex customer issues autonomously. Because of their increasing functionality and ability to solve issues without human intervention, Zendesk believes pricing models must reflect the actual value AI provides to a business. Furthermore, with pricing directly tied to outcomes, Zendesk says customers will only incur costs for issues that AI resolves autonomously.

Zendesk says that the new pricing model is designed to be flexible and allows businesses to incorporate AI agents in a way that aligns with their specific objectives, offering options to continue utilizing human agents where necessary.

The pricing for AI agents is designed to encourage utilization and scalability. A starter usage level is included at no additional cost with all Zendesk Suite and Support Plans. As AI agent usage increases, Zendesk’s pricing model scales accordingly, and a dashboard is provided to allow agent monitoring to ensure no pricing or usage surprises.

What to Watch:

Zendesk has made a name for itself by focusing on the development of AI technology that is not only designed to assist human agents but, in many cases, replace them. This technology enables human workers to be redeployed or refocused into roles where human attributes (empathy, ability to connect, etc.) can best be used to drive customer experiences.

As technology has evolved, AI agents can ingest relevant information and then make decisions or take actions, allowing organizations to deploy them in various CX roles, use cases, and scenarios to deliver excellent experiences. They can replace humans because they do the very things that humans find challenging, including finding, synthesizing, and acting upon information quickly, accurately, and consistently.

The shift to an outcome model provides vendors such as Zendesk with opportunities and challenges. First, shifting to a new model requires an education process. The company will need to clearly and transparently demonstrate how the pricing works and how it will provide more value to customers, particularly those that have directly tied spending on CX or support to human-based seat licenses.

A new outcomes-based model also requires the company to shift its internal financial benchmarks, particularly with respect to benchmarking against competitors. Internally, the business will likely need to focus on quickly driving the use of AI agents to counteract the potential reduction of seat licenses, particularly for organizations seeking to reduce the cost of CX through headcount reductions and a shift to AI.

For customers, a shift to outcome-based pricing for AI agents can be viewed as a positive step in better aligning the costs associated with providing good CX with actual ROI. In my conversations with Zendesk over the past year, executives made it clear that there will be transparent definitions around when an engagement or interaction is considered solved, in terms of both time and results, which is helpful to ensuring accountability and transparency.

What is less clear is how organizations will transition to this new model. It is unlikely that most businesses will shift 100% of their support or inbound inquiries to a fully automated AI-based system (though notably, Frontier Airlines did just that a few years ago, to mixed reactions).

Zendesk will need to provide counsel on which functions and use cases are the most likely candidates for being handled via an AI agent and which will still require a human. Internally, there should be (and probably is) an ideal migration schedule that enables Zendesk to continue growing its revenues, even as it helps companies transition to a far more transparent pricing model, which, in the short term, may impact the company’s overall revenue growth.

However, as I predicted back in December 2023, vendors are moving to consumption-based pricing models for generative AI services. Using an outcome-based approach mirrors the need for vendors to link their generative AI costs with revenue more closely. The outcome-based approach is both bold and commendable, as it clearly illustrates the high degree of confidence Zendesk has in its technology and the viability of the model as a business strategy.

As we head into the fall, I will be watching closely to see how this pricing model works in the real world, with real customers, and whether or not it delivers on its promises of greater transparency and value.

You can read the full press release at Zendesk’s website.

Disclosure: The Futurum Group is a research and advisory firm that engages or has engaged in research, analysis, and advisory services with many technology companies, including those mentioned in this article. The author does not hold any equity positions with any company mentioned in this article.

Analysis and opinions expressed herein are specific to the analyst individually and data and other information that might have been provided for validation, not those of The Futurum Group as a whole.

Other insights from The Futurum Group:

Enterprising Insights, Episode 22 – Zendesk and Avaya Analyst Day Recaps

Zendesk Unveils Comprehensive CX and Workforce Engagement Solution

Zendesk to Acquire Service Automation Provider Ultimate

Author Information

Keith Kirkpatrick is VP & Research Director, Enterprise Software & Digital Workflows for The Futurum Group. Keith has over 25 years of experience in research, marketing, and consulting-based fields.

He has authored in-depth reports and market forecast studies covering artificial intelligence, biometrics, data analytics, robotics, high performance computing, and quantum computing, with a specific focus on the use of these technologies within large enterprise organizations and SMBs. He has also established strong working relationships with the international technology vendor community and is a frequent speaker at industry conferences and events.

In his career as a financial and technology journalist he has written for national and trade publications, including BusinessWeek, CNBC.com, Investment Dealers’ Digest, The Red Herring, The Communications of the ACM, and Mobile Computing & Communications, among others.

He is a member of the Association of Independent Information Professionals (AIIP).

Keith holds dual Bachelor of Arts degrees in Magazine Journalism and Sociology from Syracuse University.

Related Insights
Is AI Ready for Real Work, or Are Enterprises Still Stuck in Experimentation?
July 4, 2026

Is AI Ready for Real Work, or Are Enterprises Still Stuck in Experimentation?

Most enterprises claim advanced AI maturity, but lack governance and deployment strategies. Leading organizations are moving from experimentation to measurable AI impact....
Compliance as Code Is No Longer Optional: Why Manual Reviews Can’t Keep Up
July 4, 2026

Compliance as Code Is No Longer Optional: Why Manual Reviews Can’t Keep Up

Qodo's 'Compliance as Code' framework automates enterprise AI compliance through PR checks, solving the data privacy and security gaps that plague manual reviews at scale....
Databricks AI’s GPU Reliability Push Exposes Hidden Risks for Large-Scale Training
July 3, 2026

Databricks AI’s GPU Reliability Push Exposes Hidden Risks for Large-Scale Training

Databricks AI reveals critical GPU reliability challenges in distributed training environments. Silent slowdowns and numerical corruption pose greater risks than visible failures, threatening model quality and compute efficiency at enterprise...
AI Code Review Hits a Wall: Why Speed Without Trust Risks Engineering Chaos
July 3, 2026

AI Code Review Hits a Wall: Why Speed Without Trust Risks Engineering Chaos

A survey shows 94% of engineering leaders use agentic AI coding tools, but 55% struggle with reliability and hallucinations—revealing a critical gap between development speed and production quality....
Brave's Browser Containers Raise the Bar for Privacy and Workflow Flexibility
July 3, 2026

Brave’s Browser Containers Raise the Bar for Privacy and Workflow Flexibility

As AI platform adoption accelerates to $181.3B projected market size, Brave's v1.92 release introduces native browser containers addressing data privacy concerns for 52.6% of enterprise decision makers managing multi-cloud AI...
Is Self-Healing ITOps Ready to Replace Manual Incident Response?
July 3, 2026

Is Self-Healing ITOps Ready to Replace Manual Incident Response?

LogicMonitor's AI-driven ITOps framework combines root-cause analysis with governed automation to reduce alert fatigue and accelerate issue resolution, as agentic AI reshapes enterprise infrastructure management....

Book a Demo

Welcome

The vision behind everything in Futurum’s Custom Research practice is this: research should show you what is happening, what comes next, and what to do about it. It should be personal to each audience, easy for people to grasp, and structured so LLMs can reason over it accurately. And it should be fast and turnkey; you want answers now, not another project to carry for quarters.

Whether you are defining business, channel, or go-to-market strategy; evaluating vendors or justifying ROI; or commissioning research to fill an emerging market need, we have your back, with a program that answers your questions with the objectivity and credibility to drive real decisions.

To do it, we bring unmatched data to bear: Futurum research, surveys, and market projections; validated market feeds; ETR’s 15 years of insight from 10,000 technology decision-makers; G2’s buyer and user data; and what our analysts hear every day. Add leading primary collection, from AI-moderated voice interviews to surveys and analyst-led interviews, all turnkey, and every project comes out credible, nuanced, and actionable.

And we don’t just drop the results in your lap. For internal work, we provide analyst-led sessions, interactive dashboards, and a range of formats. For market-facing work, Futurum delivers turnkey activation and amplification that actually gets seen, by people and by LLMs, through our media and share of voice. This is research that moves decisions and markets.

We will meet you wherever you are, from a fast-turn brief to a multi-year program, and shape the work to your goals, timeline, and budget. The right program for your moment.

If any of this is useful, I would love to talk.

Benjamin Brown, VP Custom Research, Futurum Research

Benjamin Brown

VP, Custom Research · The Futurum Group

Newsletter Sign-up Form

Get important insights straight to your inbox, receive first looks at eBooks, exclusive event invitations, custom content, and more. We promise not to spam you or sell your name to anyone. You can always unsubscribe at any time.

All fields are required






Thank you, we received your request, a member of our team will be in contact with you.