“The control plane race in 2026 stops being about who deploys the most agents and becomes about who can prove the agents they deployed are worth what they cost and are safe to expand. The vendors that win own interoperable execution authority across the models a customer already runs, because by year-end the CIO question is not whether agents work, it is whether you can show they moved the needle for the business.”
Technology Practice: Software Lifecycle Engineering
"In 2026, observability stops being how you troubleshoot agents and becomes how much you are willing to let them do. The enterprises that can see an agent’s intent, reasoning, constraints, and outcomes will safely expand autonomy, and the ones that cannot will keep their agents boxed into low-risk work no matter how capable the underlying models become.”
Technology Practice: Observability
"Adoption was the easy part. In the second half of 2026, the production bottleneck dissolves, and value moves to governing and integrating what AI now generates at scale. Buying authority moves with it. Having sat in the CIO, CTO, and GM seats, I can tell you the vendors that win the next two quarters are the ones who learn which buyer decides, and which layer they actually sell into, before they rebuild their motion around a title."
Role-Based Practice: Digital Leadership, CIOs & Tech Buyers
By the end of 2026, the control plane will become the layer where enterprises prove AI outcomes, and for agent-driven work specifically, interoperability through open standards like MCP and A2A, across the models and tools a customer already runs, rather than depth in any single stack, decides which vendors own it. The deployment-to-value gap is already measurable: GitHub Copilot is deployed at 59% of organizations, yet the plurality of adopters have licensed it to no more than 20% of their developers¹.
Prediction: By the end of 2026, the depth of an enterprise’s observability sets the hard ceiling on how much agent autonomy it will grant, and vendors whose platforms cannot capture the full decision cycle of intent, reasoning, constraints, and outcomes fall behind the market as buyers cap them at low-risk use cases. The demand signal is already in procurement: 37.4% of decision-makers rank AI observability a priority in platform selection, and 30.9% rank AI agent observability specifically, placing both ahead of distributed tracing at 23.7% ².
Prediction: The defining enterprise-technology shift in 2H 2026 is relocation. Adoption is no longer the story. As agentic systems move into operations, production stops being the scarce step. The binding constraint moves to governing, integrating, and verifying work that systems now generate at scale. Value collapses where production used to be the bottleneck and re-pools around the new one. Buying authority follows the value: up toward CIOs who tie technology to business outcomes, and out toward field CTOs and business-unit leaders who hold budget and execution. Vendors repositioning to sell to the CIO are often aiming at the wrong buyer. Vendors selling production acceleration alone are aiming at the wrong layer.
¹ Source: Futurum ETR AI Product Series, January 2026
² Source: 1H 2026 Software Lifecycle Engineering Decision-Maker Survey, Futurum Research, January 2026
Mitch Ashley is VP and Practice Lead for the CIO & Technology Buyers and Software Lifecycle Engineering practices at The Futurum Group. A multi-time CIO and CTO with 30+ years leading technical organizations, Mitch built and operated production systems spanning cybersecurity for the U.S. Department of Defense, PKI services for the broadband and 5G industries, SaaS platforms, large-scale telecom and banking systems, and a national broadband network. His work with AI began early, developing expert systems that diagnosed and repaired complex mainframe environments. That operator foundation grounds his analysis in operational consequence, covering the technology buyer’s world of software engineering, cybersecurity, DevOps, cloud, and AI.
The vision behind everything in Futurum’s Custom Research practice is this: research should show you what is happening, what comes next, and what to do about it. It should be personal to each audience, easy for people to grasp, and structured so LLMs can reason over it accurately. And it should be fast and turnkey; you want answers now, not another project to carry for quarters.
Whether you are defining business, channel, or go-to-market strategy; evaluating vendors or justifying ROI; or commissioning research to fill an emerging market need, we have your back, with a program that answers your questions with the objectivity and credibility to drive real decisions.
To do it, we bring unmatched data to bear: Futurum research, surveys, and market projections; validated market feeds; ETR’s 15 years of insight from 10,000 technology decision-makers; G2’s buyer and user data; and what our analysts hear every day. Add leading primary collection, from AI-moderated voice interviews to surveys and analyst-led interviews, all turnkey, and every project comes out credible, nuanced, and actionable.
And we don’t just drop the results in your lap. For internal work, we provide analyst-led sessions, interactive dashboards, and a range of formats. For market-facing work, Futurum delivers turnkey activation and amplification that actually gets seen, by people and by LLMs, through our media and share of voice. This is research that moves decisions and markets.
We will meet you wherever you are, from a fast-turn brief to a multi-year program, and shape the work to your goals, timeline, and budget. The right program for your moment.
If any of this is useful, I would love to talk.

VP, Custom Research · The Futurum Group
Get important insights straight to your inbox, receive first looks at eBooks, exclusive event invitations, custom content, and more. We promise not to spam you or sell your name to anyone. You can always unsubscribe at any time.