Menu

Quantum in Context: Quantum Companies Rotate in New Leaders

Quantum in Context: Quantum Companies Rotate in New Leaders

The News: In the last several months, several quantum computing companies, including Atom Computing, Infleqtion, Oxford Quantum Circuits, and Quantum Circuits Inc., have replaced their CEOs. Two others, Pasqal and IQM, have shifted to co-CEOs. This is a quickening but not unusual trend among startups in high-profile deep-tech areas that require significant investment.

Quantum in Context: Quantum Companies Rotate in New Leaders

Analyst Take: It’s not unusual for startups to replace their CEOs. Some reasons are financial, some are personal, and some are about having the right person or people at the helm at the right time. It’s worth examining why the quantum industry is undergoing this leadership transformation, beyond the normal reasons and “happy talk” that often accompanies company announcements.

The New CEOs

The companies that recently announced new CEOs include:

Also, in February, neutral atom computing company Pasqal announced that it had promoted Loïc Henriet to co-CEO with Georges-Olivier Reymond. In the same month, IQM Quantum Computers announced that Mikko Välimäki would join Jan Goetz as co-CEO.

The company links are to press releases or articles announcing the changes.

I deeply admire anyone who would find or accept the mantle of CEO of a quantum computing company while we build this industry over the next several years to reach Practical Quantum Advantage.

Why Startups Change Leadership

Here are some reasons why any startup might replace or supplement its top leadership. To be clear, I am in no way ascribing any of these reasons to any CEOs mentioned. This is a general list that applies across all tech industries. I’ve listed them alphabetically by first word since they can all derail a leader’s job security:

  • Burnout
  • Establishing an internal echo chamber that fails to provide honest feedback
  • Ethical or legal violations
  • Failure to develop products and drive revenue
  • Failure to make critical hires or make the hard choices to have the correct people at the company
  • Failure to meet internal metrics and milestones set by the Board of Directors
  • Failure to pivot from a failing business model
  • Failure to secure necessary private or public funding
  • Hubris
  • Inability to prioritize correctly or at all
  • Incompatibility with the Board of Directors and not seeking their advice
  • Irrational optimism instead of optimistic morale-building
  • Lack of people skills
  • Lack of understanding of industry competition
  • Loss of faith by the Board of Directors
  • New and better job offer
  • Not seeking advice or mentorship from paid or unpaid external advisors
  • Overspending
  • Personal, family, or health-related situation
  • Poor public image in speaking and media opportunities
  • Problems transitioning from an academic to a business role
  • Rapid pivots and inconsistent messaging
  • Slow decision-making
  • Wrong leader at the current stage of the company’s evolution

Just do all that right, and you are home free!

I want to emphasize the last point, “Wrong leader at the current stage of the company’s evolution.” While a founder or early CEO may dream of becoming the next Michael Dell, Jayshree Ullal, or Jensen Huang, most do not last that long or become billionaires.

It is perfectly fine to start as a professor, become the first CEO, get equity, and turn the reins over to a more seasoned business professional to take the company to the next level. Besides, you might really want to do research and teach.

Just as some investment firms specialize in funding companies at the individual seed, A, B, C, and beyond series, a CEO might do best at steering the company toward each series and then exiting. Company valuations change at each level, and the CEO, leadership team, and Board must consist of the right people to accelerate growth and revenue. There is no loss of pride in saying, “I can get this company to its Series A funding and then hand it off to another person,” or specific later rounds.

Business Forces Affecting the Quantum Industry

Is there anything special about the quantum industry related to my reasons for failure above?

We used to joke that practical quantum computing was ten years away. We would say that every year. Things have improved! Now, we say it is three to five years away. I’m being humorous, and we may indeed see some significant breakthroughs soon beyond the steady innovations. However, people tune out when you constantly promise something and don’t deliver. Investors may decide that the ROI in a suitable period is insufficient for their strategic profiles. If you, as a leader, spout hyperbole and do not deliver, you may be looking for a new job.

AI, specifically Generative AI, is pulling in a lot of private investment dollars. This is money that potentially will not go to quantum. The time between funding rounds may increase. Quantum CEOs must spend wisely and frugally on people and other resources. There is a difference between being frugal and being cheap. Frugal means intelligently and strategically spending as little as possible on necessary expenses. Cheap means cutting spending arbitrarily. “No more travel!” may quickly mean “No more customers!”. There is a cost to diminished morale caused by overt cheapness, often expressed as decreased productivity or loss of key people.

Finally, quantum is deep tech, and many founders come from academia, especially physics. Consider being a serial academic entrepreneur and replacing yourself early on with business professionals if you are not committed to personal excellence and focus in that area. It may be time for that VC on the Board to step in as CEO. That said, many genuinely excellent business CEOs started their careers as academics. They applied the drive, curiosity, and search for learning that made them successful scholars in their new careers.

Key Takeaway

Quantum computing is an exciting but sometimes over-hyped new technology with great promise for use cases in modeling physical processes, chemistry, materials science, financial services, and possibly AI and optimization. Many companies have entered the field, and some are more successful than others in progressing through their funding rounds. We are seeing turnover in the leadership of some of the better-known companies. This is natural and not a reason to fear for the future of the technology.

Disclosure: The Futurum Group is a research and advisory firm that engages or has engaged in research, analysis, and advisory services with many technology companies, including those mentioned in this article. The author is a former employee of Infleqtion and holds an equity position in the company. The author does not hold an equity position in any other company mentioned in this article.

Analysis and opinions expressed herein are specific to the analyst individually and data and other information that might have been provided for validation, not those of The Futurum Group as a whole.

Other Insights from The Futurum Group:

Quantum in Context: A Qubit Primer

Quantum in Context: Pasqal Is the Latest to Publish a Roadmap

The Case for On-Premises Quantum Computers

Author Information

Dr. Bob Sutor

Dr. Bob Sutor is an expert in quantum technologies with 40+ years of experience. He is the accomplished author of the quantum computing book Dancing with Qubits, Second Edition. Bob is dedicated to evolving quantum to help solve society's critical computational problems.

Related Insights
Google Debuts Pixel 10A Amidst Minimal Hardware Evolution
February 20, 2026

Google Debuts Pixel 10A Amidst Minimal Hardware Evolution

Olivier Blanchard, Research Director at Futurum, dives into the timing, specs, competitive advantages, market positioning, and strategic importance of Google’s Pixel 10A release....
Analog Devices Q1 FY 2026 Broad-Based Recovery with AI Data Center Upside
February 20, 2026

Analog Devices Q1 FY 2026: Broad-Based Recovery with AI Data Center Upside

Brendan Burke, Research Director at Futurum, analyzes Analog Devices’ Q1 FY 2026 earnings, highlighting Industrial and Communications momentum, AI data center power/optics growth, pricing cadence, and a stronger second-half setup....
Cadence Q4 FY 2025 Earnings Underscore AI-Led EDA Momentum
February 20, 2026

Cadence Q4 FY 2025 Earnings Underscore AI-Led EDA Momentum

Brendan Burke, Research Director at Futurum, analyzes Cadence’s Q4 FY 2025 results, highlighting agentic AI workflows, hardware demand at hyperscalers, and portfolio traction across EDA, IP, and SDA that shape...
Will NVIDIA’s Meta Deal Ignite a CPU Supercycle
February 20, 2026

Will NVIDIA’s Meta Deal Ignite a CPU Supercycle?

Brendan Burke, Research Director at Futurum, analyzes NVIDIA and Meta's expanded partnership, deploying standalone Grace and Vera CPUs at hyperscale, signaling that agentic AI workloads are creating a new discrete...
Applied Materials Q1 FY 2026 AI Demand Lifts Outlook
February 17, 2026

Applied Materials Q1 FY 2026: AI Demand Lifts Outlook

Brendan Burke, Research Director at Futurum, analyzes Applied Materials’ Q1 FY 2026, highlighting AI-driven mix to leading-edge logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, new product launches, and services leverage....
Can Cadence Shorten Chip Design Timelines with ChipStack AI
February 16, 2026

Can Cadence Shorten Chip Design Timelines with ChipStack AI?

Brendan Burke, Research Director at Futurum, assesses Cadence’s launch of ChipStack, an agentic AI workflow for front‑end chip design and verification, using a structured “Mental Model” to coordinate multiple agents....

Book a Demo

Newsletter Sign-up Form

Get important insights straight to your inbox, receive first looks at eBooks, exclusive event invitations, custom content, and more. We promise not to spam you or sell your name to anyone. You can always unsubscribe at any time.

All fields are required






Thank you, we received your request, a member of our team will be in contact with you.