"Enterprise buyers have made their pricing preference clear: seat-based licensing is out for core software, but when it comes to AI, they want cost predictability more than they want to chase usage or outcomes. Small and very large enterprises have established a preference for outcome-based AI pricing, while companies in the middle prefer more traditional add-on or consumption pricing. That split creates a real tension for vendors, and those vendors clinging to rigid structures will find themselves quietly dropped from consideration, not because their product is weaker, but because their commercial model doesn't match how buyers are balancing risk and value today."

Keith Kirkpatrick

Vice President & Research Director, Enterprise Software & Digital Workflows

Pricing Optionality to Become Tables-Stakes by Q4 2026

By the end of Q4 2026, vendors will need to offer multiple pricing models, including value-linked approaches, to respond to buyer pressure and the need to more closely manage value, cost predictability, and scale. Vendors that fail to provide flexible pricing approaches will find themselves struggling to gain consideration by potential buyers.

Futurum’s 2H 2026 Enterprise Applications Decision-Makers survey shows enterprise buyers are pulling away from flat, per-seat pricing for core software purchases, but the picture for AI-specific pricing is more fragmented than a simple “seat-based is dead” narrative suggests, and vendors chasing one clean model risk misreading the market.

For core enterprise software generally, per-user-per-month is now the least-preferred pricing structure among buyers who name pricing as a top purchase criterion. That’s a real and significant move away from the seat-based default of the last decade, driven largely by the anticipated shift to agentic workers who aren’t tied to physical workers.

Generative AI functionality, however, tells a different story. Among buyers whose vendors charge separately for GenAI, per-seat pricing is the top preference, largely because buyers seek predictable, budgetable costs for AI specifically, even while demanding usage- and outcome-based pricing elsewhere, creating a clear tension for vendors to resolve.

  • Evolving Buyer Preferences: According to Futurum’s 2H 2026 Enterprise Software Decision Makers survey, buyers evaluating core software purchases now rank per-seat pricing dead last among five pricing models (12.6%), with consumption-based (28.9%) and outcome-based (22.2%) leading. For generative AI functionality specifically, however, the picture flips: when AI is priced as a separate add-on, 42.3% of buyers still prefer per-seat pricing over consumption (36.6%) or outcomes (21.1%), suggesting buyers want cost predictability for AI even as they abandon seat-based pricing for the rest of their stack.
  • Market Momentum: Early movers like Zendesk, Intercom, and Decagon have already shifted to pure outcome-based models, while major incumbents, including Salesforce, Adobe, Pegasystems, and ServiceNow, are utilizing hybrid frameworks that incorporate consumption and outcome-linked elements. Varying company types, use cases, and levels of risk tolerance demand a flexible pricing approach that still allows users to see the value delivered by the core software and AI offerings.

Pricing flexibility alone won’t win deals, but its absence will lose them. Vendors must pursue a three-pronged strategy: 

  • Instrument their platforms to generate transparent value metrics regardless of whether the commercial model is pure outcome, consumption, or hybrid. 
  • Build pricing optionality that enables enterprise procurement teams to select the model aligned with their risk appetite and use-case maturity.
  • Invest in customer success as a revenue function, not a cost center, because co-owned outcomes require ongoing engagement infrastructure. 

The vendors that continue with limited pricing flexibility will find themselves excluded not because their technology is inferior, but because their commercial architecture signals misalignment with how buyers are managing value perception and risk.

Keith Kirkpatrick is Vice President & Research Director, Enterprise Software & Digital Workflows with The Futurum Group. His coverage area encompasses enterprise applications, platforms, and tools, and the technologies and tools that underpin them, including artificial intelligence, automation, and integration technologies. He has more than 25 years of experience in research, marketing, and consulting-based fields, and is frequently sought out by the vendor community and trade media for his insights and commentary.

Recent Insights, News & Research

ServiceNow's AI Passport Closes the Agentic Governance Gap
October 15, 2026

ServiceNow's AI Passport Closes the Agentic Governance Gap

ServiceNow's AI Passport uses cryptographic credentials to verify AI agents' authorized scope, addressing a critical governance gap: 100% of banks use AI, but only 24% have governance frameworks....
Will AI Assistants Use Zendesk's Open Service Directory?
October 15, 2026

Will AI Assistants Use Zendesk’s Open Service Directory?

Keith Kirkpatrick, Vice President, Research at Futurum, shares his insights on Zendesk's Open Service Directory and whether AI assistant makers and rival CX platforms will adopt it....
Freshworks to Acquire Torii, Extending Freshservice to AI Spend Governance
October 15, 2026

Freshworks to Acquire Torii, Extending Freshservice to AI Spend Governance

Keith Kirkpatrick, VP of Research at Futurum, shares his insights on Freshworks' deal for Torii and why AI spend governance may become the next battleground for ITSM platforms....
Salesforce Bets on Loops to Extend Its Analytics Lead with Agentic Intelligence
October 13, 2026

Salesforce Bets on Loops to Extend Its Analytics Lead with Agentic Intelligence

Keith Kirkpatrick, Vice President & Research Director, Enterprise Software & Di at Futurum, analyzes how Salesforce's acquisition of Loops embeds agentic intelligence into Tableau to advance continuous KPI monitoring and...
SAP Expands Workforce Learning With WalkMe Learning Arc
October 9, 2026

SAP Expands Workforce Learning With WalkMe Learning Arc

Keith Kirkpatrick, Research Director at The Futurum Group shares insights on WalkMe Learning Arc’s SAP SuccessFactors integration and the milestones that will test its learning workflow....
SAP Makes Work Intelligence Central to SuccessFactors
October 9, 2026

SAP Makes Work Intelligence Central to SuccessFactors

Keith Kirkpatrick, Research Director at The Futurum Group shares insights on SAP’s TechWolf acquisition, workforce context for Joule, and work intelligence in SuccessFactors....

Book a Demo

Welcome

The vision behind everything in Futurum’s Custom Research practice is this: research should show you what is happening, what comes next, and what to do about it. It should be personal to each audience, easy for people to grasp, and structured so LLMs can reason over it accurately. And it should be fast and turnkey; you want answers now, not another project to carry for quarters.

Whether you are defining business, channel, or go-to-market strategy; evaluating vendors or justifying ROI; or commissioning research to fill an emerging market need, we have your back, with a program that answers your questions with the objectivity and credibility to drive real decisions.

To do it, we bring unmatched data to bear: Futurum research, surveys, and market projections; validated market feeds; ETR’s 15 years of insight from 10,000 technology decision-makers; G2’s buyer and user data; and what our analysts hear every day. Add leading primary collection, from AI-moderated voice interviews to surveys and analyst-led interviews, all turnkey, and every project comes out credible, nuanced, and actionable.

And we don’t just drop the results in your lap. For internal work, we provide analyst-led sessions, interactive dashboards, and a range of formats. For market-facing work, Futurum delivers turnkey activation and amplification that actually gets seen, by people and by LLMs, through our media and share of voice. This is research that moves decisions and markets.

We will meet you wherever you are, from a fast-turn brief to a multi-year program, and shape the work to your goals, timeline, and budget. The right program for your moment.

If any of this is useful, I would love to talk.

Benjamin Brown, VP Custom Research, Futurum Research

Benjamin Brown

VP, Custom Research · The Futurum Group

Newsletter Sign-up Form

Get important insights straight to your inbox, receive first looks at eBooks, exclusive event invitations, custom content, and more. We promise not to spam you or sell your name to anyone. You can always unsubscribe at any time.

All fields are required






Thank you, we received your request, a member of our team will be in contact with you.